Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matt Cyr's avatar

Love all this, the tricky relationship with horse racing while having an appreciation for horses, your reflection on the annual hometown invasion, and how AI has now made slippery what used to be a consistently positive adjective, referring to something living as a “machine.”

For me, horse racing is a lot like combat sports, hard for me to square. I had family that lived in Paris, KY, have been to the track many times, even attended the Preakness a couple years (bonafide shit show)… the mixed feelings of love/hate/appreciation for it (save for maybe the asterisk that the horses don’t have a choice in any of it) make it one of those things I can’t totally quit, and willingly take in from time to time, a drug of sorts, with or without trifectas.

One of my favorite movies growing up, Phar Lap, was about the legendary Aussie race horse. The film is melodramatic in spots but has some great scenes for anyone who loves horses. Phar Lap had some similarities to both SeaBiscuit (underdog horse, inspiring during the depression) and Secretariat (enlarged heart, albeit not as big), but suffered a tragic end worth a read and one of those wikipedia rabbit hole sessions you mentioned.

Great post, well done. Plenty to mine here for fiction as well, fun to see that in a post like this.

Helen Grover's avatar

Having been to the Kentucky Derby I think you have good instincts about horse races and shouldn’t ignore them. I’ve never seen the idea of racehorses as a kind of technology explored but it feels pretty accurate (and morally wrong to me). I think the fear we’ll do this to ourselves is justified. I also think we’ve tried to perfect or improve the human condition in very shortsighted ways before.

I can definitely see how people wanted powerful tech incorporated into their bodies but as a counter point things like War Games and the original Tron to a lesser extent both presented AI as an external threat (because the protagonist can enter the digital world). There’s also the Terminator but that feels less relevant bc it’s about a physical robot. Either way these things still imitate people and like you describe that’s very uncomfortable. Because chatbots (I’m sure there’s some esoteric difference between LLMs and chat bots but this is how they’re used) are the most common ai we interact with I think the imitation factor is the most salient. Downstream of that imitation is the idea we’ll give AI jobs only humans should have.

I’m sure you’ve seen me go on paranoid rants before (sorry) but I’m most concerned about the military applications of AI. AI targeting systems have been used multiple global conflicts at this point and the US uses AI to conduct mass surveillance all over the world but the case I’m most familiar with is in India. Sometimes these programs are operating without much oversight and that’s scary.

Anyway Palantir is bad and more nonfiction on Substack should look like this.

19 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?